"Failing the DNA Test," Michael Blanding and Lindsay Markel, November 20, 2011, The Boston Globe Magazine
WBUR's Radio Boston hosts talk with Schuster Senior Fellow Michael Blanding about DNA testing for prisoners in Massachusetts
WGBH's Phillip Martin discusses the proposed Mass. DNA access law: Part 1 | Part 2
- Post-conviction DNA testing in Massachusetts: "Failing the Test"
- Waiting for DNA: More about Massachusetts prisoners claiming innocence who are featured in the article
- Exonerated by DNA: Massachusetts wrongful convictions overturned
- Background: A primer on the Massachusetts DNA access bill
- Underlying issue: No law requiring preservation of crime scene evidence
- Digging deeper: What do exonerations teach us about the criminal justice system?
- Non-DNA cases: What happens if there is no DNA to test?
How do wrongful convictions occur?
- Eyewitness misidentification<
- Faulty forensics, or bad science
- False confessions
- Informants and "snitches"
- Bad lawyering or representation in court
- Misconduct by prosecutors or law enforcement
Journalists' guide: How you can localize the Troy Davis story in your state
What is Brandeis doing to remedy and prevent wrongful convictions?
Causes of Wrongful Convictions:
Eyewitness
Misidentification
When mistakes are made in identifying the perpetrator of a crime, wrongful convictions occur and innocent people go to jail. Eyewitness misidentification has featured in 75 percent of all wrongful convictions in America cleared by DNA testing, according to The Innocence Project.
The interactive graphic above is a joint project between the Innocence Project and Brandon Garrett, author of "Convicting the Innocent."
Last page update: November 18, 2011© 2011 Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA. All rights reserved.