Home The Workings Help Site
Milestones Charter Strategies Mission & Scope
Previous TOC Next
charter 1 | charter 2 | charter 3 | charter 4 | charter 5
charter 6 | charter 7 | charter 8 | charter 9 | charter 10
Brandeis PEAK Project Charter
Risks and Constraints
Risks
Constraints

Risks

The following are risks that may jeopardize the success of the project. Some are common to any implementation project, others are specific to this organization and the complexities of this initiative. Brandeis University's Project Management will monitor these risks and communicate to the Steering Committee when any risk becomes an impediment to the project plan. Some shared risks will require a proactive strategy to ensure that they do not impede the project.
Risk/Owner Mitigation
Insufficient resources (employee turnover)

Owner: Steering Committee,
Project Manager
HR
Cross train resources.
Document decisions and processes.
Offer an incentive program.
Develop and offer career plans.
Backfill positions.
Hire consultants.
Burn-Out Lack of Team Morale

Owner: Project Manager
Project Team,
HR
Recognize accomplishments.
Set reasonable expectations.
Hold fun events.
Present incentives and rewards.
Award time-off.
Expect reasonable and flexible hours.
Prepare an intervention plan and recognize problems early.
Devise a method for communicating and alleviating stress.
Up
The inability on the part of senior management to make timely decisions

Owner: Project Manager
Practice proactive planning and communications.
Give people time to decide.
Encourage the project team to present management with alternatives, recommendations, and information on priority and impact.
Define the issues carefully.
Formalize the process for issue resolution and escalation with a fixed time frame and methods of communication.
The Brandeis community resists change

Owner: Executive Sponsor
Sell the project's benefits.
Invite community members to participate in an information group.
Provide appropriate training, documentation, and communication.
Pay attention to this early and often
Up
Miscommunication (between the sponsor the steering committee and end users)

Owner: Project Manager
Change Manager
Build communication between project team and steering committee.
Provide a communication strategy to the community and functional users who are not a part of the project.
Build a project web site.
Lack of proper facilities

Owner: Steering Committee
\Provide dedicated project training space.
Provide dedicated team working space for the group and for individuals.
Lack of budget resources

Owner: Steering Committee,
Sponsor
Just say "No."
Refer to project plan and scope.
Manage scope creep.
Up
Loss of sponsorship

Owner: Steering Committee,
Project Manager
Review project charter.
Project Manager and Steering Committee provide direction.
Unclear direction (tasks)

Owner: Project Manager
Produce a detailed and clear project plan.
Plan or scope too aggressive

Owner: Steering Committee,
Project Manager
Revisit the scope.
Staff with the best people with the right skills at the right time.
Create and maintain a good project plan to deliver and manage according to that project plan.
Up
Users have unrealistic expectations

Owner: Steering Committee,
Project Manager
Sponsor
Educate and communicate with users early and often.
Follow the communication strategy
Present the big picture and present it at the user level.
Be honest with the users, have attainable expectations.
Get cooperation from users.
Lack of skills for key users and functional end users

Owner: Project Team (Define Requirements)
Departments
(assess)
ITS/HR
(Execute Training & Counseling)
Assess users' skills.
Educate and train manager.
Provide documentation.
Involve key users in testing and fit/gap analysis.
Offer a certification program.
Set minimum requirements for PeopleSoft.
Up
Lack of skills for project team

Owner: Project Team,
Project Director
Train project team.
Transfer consultants' skills and knowledge.
Wrong project participation choices

Owner: Steering Committee
Clearly define staff roles.
Staff with people who can meet project demands.
Seek expert help when needed.
Recognize the need for change and make the change early.
Empower team to make decisions.
Changes in PeopleSoft team

Owner: Project Manager
Plan early.
Transfer knowledge early and often to minimize dependency on consultants.
Gain commitment from PeopleSoft.
Provide the same environment for PeopleSoft consultants as for Brandeis staff.
Up
Software problems (functionality)

Owner: Project Manager
Steering Committee (for escalation)
Complain.
Hold back payment.
Establish an issue escalation process with Account Executive and Customer Executive.
Test early. Apply patches within a plan.
Lack of IT resources to support current system

Owner: Steering Committee
Freeze enhancements and modifications to the current system.
Recognize this problem and lower expectations of what needs to be done.
Outsource to get tasks done.
Scope Creep

Owner: Project Manager
Steering Committee
Just say 'No.'
Don't do it.
Devise a process for escalation, which includes an assessment of value and complete costs.
Communicate this process to the project team.
Up
Lack of team cohesion and commitment

Owner: Project Manager
Project Team
Create a shared facility.
Establish ground rules for the team.
Create and present a good working environment.
Run a naming project.
Have fun events.
Stay on plan - meet deliverables.
Competition for resources from other organizational projects and implementations.

Owner: Project Manager,
Steering Committee
Say 'No' to other resource requests.
Communicate the plan and priorities.
Staff the project team to the required level.
Specify what is included in the normal services (reset current expectations).
Changes in external requirements resulting in scope changes

Owner: Project Manager
Steering Committee (decision makers)
Plan early.
Communicate to the Brandeis community the impact of scope changes.
Recognize as scope creep (value judgement/project plan).
Not using best practices as a consideration for a decision

Owner: Steering Committee,
Project Manager
Communicate 'best practices.'
Manage change.
Implement PeopleSoft-centric process change.


up

Constraints

This project works under the following constraints

External

Regulatory compliance -
Tax processing (HR, AP, SIS - January)
EEO Reporting (HR - end of calendar quarter)
Calendar Year-End

Vendor or Partner Relationships -
Open Enrollment (HR - November/December)

Internal


Internal University Strategic Directions -
New Management Structure - Direction Change
Budget (project)
RCM - Financial, Budget, HR
University priorities and initiative

Staffing Limitations -
Project Team Staffing - finding appropriate staff for backfill is a major challenge
Staff may not have appropriate skill levels

Other Project Priorities -
Fiscal Year-End Processes (FIN - June/July/August)
Increase Process (HR - Faculty in September; Staff March/July)
Fall Peak (Student - July/September)

University Culture -
The community has not engaged in projects of this magnitude before.
up

Previous TOC Next
Home | The Workings | Overview | Help | Site
Search
Milestones | Project Charter | Strategies | Mission & Scope
bps site v1.0, last modified: 1/3/2002, 04:19 PM