OUR REPORTING ON INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION

Corruption in international adoptions

Expand All / Collapse All

THE LIE WE LOVE: ORPHANS & INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION
LEGISLATION
VIETNAM CASE STUDY: ADOPTION
NEPAL CASE STUDY: ADOPTION
GUATEMALA CASE STUDY: ADOPTION
SIERRA LEONE CASE STUDY: ADOPTION
ETHIOPIA CASE STUDY: ADOPTION
OUR COMMENTARY
POLICIES FOR FAIRER PRACTICE
MAPS
BACKGROUND
READER RESPONSE TO OUR WORK
RESEARCH SOURCES
COUNTRY BY COUNTRY: REPORTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Where do babies come from? International adoption map
 


Fraud & Corruption in
 International Adoptions



Over the past decades,hundreds of thousands of large-hearted Westerners—eager to fill out their families while helping a child in need–have adopted from poor and troubled countries. In many cases—especially in adoptions from China or former Soviet bloc countries—these adoptions were desperately needed, saving children from crippling lives in hard-hearted institutions. But too few Westerners are aware that in too many countries, there’s a heartbreaking underside to international adoption. For decades, international adoption has been a Wild West, all but free of meaningful law, regulation, or oversight. Western adoption agencies, seeking to satisfy consumer demand, have poured millions of dollars of adoption fees into underdeveloped countries. Those dollars and Euros have, too often, induced the unscrupulous to buy, defraud, coerce, and sometimes even kidnap children away from families that loved and would have raised them to adulthood.

Since the fall of 2008, the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism has been releasing our reporting on aspects of this problem. Where did Westerners get the idea that the world was overflowing with healthy orphaned babies in need of new homes? How is a child with a living family transformed into a “paper orphan,” adopted for someone else’s profit? Whose lives have been scarred by corrupt adoptions? What U.S. policy changes might prevent children from being wrongfully taken from their birthfamilies, simultaneously helping to keep Americans from unwittingly creating an orphan instead of saving one?

This website offers a collection of the Schuster Institute’s releases on intercountry adoption, as well as many of the source documents, independent research, government materials, and other resources that will help interested readers pursue the topic further if they wish.

Many publications, reporters, broadcasters, and bloggers tell stories about what’s right with international adoption. As an investigative reporting institute, we feel an obligation to speak for those whose stories have not been told. And so our Institute has been investigating what can happen when things go wrong, and why. We hope that this information will be useful to concerned citizens and policymakers. Below are brief descriptions of, and links to, all the pieces in our series released so far.

Focus on International Adoption in Guatemala by Erin Siegal:

"Finding Fernanda: Two Mothers, One Child, and a Cross-Border Search for Truth," Erin Siegal, May 8, 2012, Beacon Press.

"The U.S. Embassy Cables: Adoption Fraud in Guatemala, 1987-2010," Erin Siegal, February 1, 2012, Cathexis Press. Read excerpts>

Guatemala Court Revokes Passport, Asks for Return of Child Karen Abigail. Following her extensive investigation, Schuster Institute Fellow Erin Siegal reports on the sad and twisted drama of the allegedly stolen child Anyelí Liseth Hernández Rodríguez, kidnapped in November 3, 2006, and Karen Abigail, adopted from Guatemala to American parents in Missouri.

 "The Makeni Children," August 9, 2011, Slate.com. The international adoption of 29 children from Sierra Leone to the West in 1998 occurred during a civil war. Adoptive parents believed they were rescuing orphans. But the birth families say they've been searching for the children ever since.

What happens when it appears that international adoption hasn’t saved an orphan—but, rather, created one? Can justice be done?
In a riveting three-part series, E.J. Graff investigates the stories of two children adopted during Sierra Leone’s civil war in 1998.

Thirteen years later, their American adoptive families—who had believed they were rescuing orphans—learned that birth families were still searching for those children.

Graff sheds light on the adoption process and what went wrong. In what may be the first time anywhere, she takes readers through every stop along the chain: birth families, adoptive families, an adopted child, a government official, and the responsible adoption and child welfare agencies.

  • Part I: In 1998, Americans Adopted 29 Children From a Town in Sierra Leone. Their Birth Families Say They Were Stolen
  • Part II: That Was the Last Time We Ever Saw These Children
  • Part III: How Flawed is the International Adoption Process?

In "The Stolen Makeni Children," (May 11, 2012, Slate.com) Graff revisits the story of the Makeni children in Sierra Leone. In April 2012, the Sierra Leonean government shut down and launched an investigation into HANCI, the child welfare organization that placed the children for adoption, saying the biological families “cannot be said to have genuinely consented.”  After 14 years, will the Makeni families be reunited?

"Anatomy of an Adoption Crisis,"  ForeignPolicy.com, September 12, 2010.

Two years ago this month, American adoptions from Vietnam ceased. In "Anatomy of an Adoption Crisis," Schuster Institute Associate Director E.J. Graff analyzes hundreds of pages of often-shocking internal U.S. State Department documents (received under Freedom of Information Act requests) discussing why the U.S. believed those adoptions had to end. Posted on the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism’s website,  those documents reveal what the U.S. Embassy believed it was finding, including:

  • “baby buying and baby farming.”
  • “the murder of four Vietnamese by kidnappers seeing fresh babies for the [adoption] trade.”
  • “networks that recruit pregnant women, pay them for their children, arrange for them to stay in safe houses, and then create fraudulent documents to make it appear that the child was abandoned.”
  • “organized networks engaged in child buying and laundering throughout Vietnam.”
  • Hospitals and orphanages “declaring children ‘abandoned’ and plac[ing] them for adoption without the birth parents’ knowledge or consent.”
  • Police officers, orphanage directors, hospital workers, Vietnamese government officials, and American adoption agency recruiters colluding to defraud birth families and “supply infants to meet the demand created by U.S. adopting parents.”

The article reveals how determined the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi was to block fraudulent or corrupt adoptions—and how little power it had to do so.

"The Baby Business," policy proposals for fairer international adoption practice, Democracy Journal, Summer 2010.

The United States needs improved policies, practices, and regulations that help prevent the criminal underside of the adoption trade—as well as support systems to help poor families and disrupted communities keep their children home. Already in place are a treaty, a law, sets of regulations, and a host of aid efforts on behalf of children. But significant gaps remain. Plugging some important holes, outlined here, would go a long way toward saving children from being wrongfully taken from their birth families, and saving Americans from discovering they unwittingly paid someone to buy them a child.

  • Experts respond: Symposium of writings by researchers, leaders, and policymakers in international adoption in response to "The Baby Business."

"The Lie We Love": exposing the world orphan myth, Foreign Policy, November/December 2008.

The story of abandoned or orphaned infants and toddlers in developing countries who need to be whisked away to adoring moms and dads in faraway lands is, unfortunately, largely fiction. So writes E.J. Graff, associate director and senior researcher at the Schuster Institute in her award-winning investigative article "The Lie We Love," published in Foreign Policy's Nov./Dec. 2008 issue. The article exposes the myth of a world orphan crisis—and reveals that the disproportionately large amounts of Western money offered in poor or corrupt countries can too often induce unscrupulous middlemen to buy, coerce, defraud, or kidnap children away from families that would have raised them to adulthood.

The article has received four prestigious journalism awards: the Society of Professional Journalists’ 2008 Sigma Chi Delta Award in Journalism for the Best in Magazine Investigative Reporting; 2008 James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism, the 2009 Clarion Award for Best Magazine Feature Article; and the 2009 Casey Medals for Meritorious Journalism honorable mention for Magazine Reporting.

"The Orphan Trade: A look at families affected by corrupt international adoptions," Slate.com, May 8, 2009.

"The Adoption Underworld," The Washington Post, January 11, 2009, which includes:

"The orphan manufacturing chain," How does the money change hands in ways that transform a child with a family into a paper “orphan” for adoption?

"Out of Cambodia," In 1999, a child finder was paid $300 to recruit Songkea, a 9 or 10 year-old Cambodian girl, for adoption. In 2004, she and her adoptive mother visited her biological family for the first time in 5 years. With pictures.

"The Adoption Underworld" was selected as the 2010 Clarion Award Winner for Best in Newspaper Feature Articles.

Commentary

Commentary by E.J. Graff for The American Prospect:

"Don't Adopt from Ethiopia," E.J. Graff, May 3, 2012. 

"International Adoption or Child Trafficking?" E.J. Graff, January 6, 2012. 

"Lies, Damn Lies, and Adoption," E.J. Graff, November 11, 2011. 

"Adoption Fraud in Guatemala," E.J. Graff, September 29, 2011. 

"Adoption is Not a Solution for Poor Children," E.J. Graff, September 22, 2011.

"Adopting new standards on adoption," E.J. Graff, "Comment is Free," Guardian.co.uk, September 10, 2010.

"Preventing adoption disasters," E.J. Graff, The Boston Globe Op-Ed, April 17, 2010.

"Misunderstanding 'Orphan' and 'Orphanage'," NYTimes.com "Room for Debate" opinion blog, February 1, 2010. 

"The Seamier Side of International Adoption," NYTimes.com "Room for Debate" opinion blog, May 10, 2009.

"The problem with saving the world's 'orphans'," The Boston Globe, December 11, 2008.

Where do babies come from?

Over the past two decades, serious irregularities in international adoption have been documented in a variety of publications and broadcasts around the world. Until now, these individual reports and stories have never been pulled together so that prospective parents, adoption industry experts, opinion leaders, and policymakers can look at them in a systematic way. Click on our interactive map to find documentation of adoption abuses in a number of countries, including links to original news reports and academic research.

Please email us if you would like to: 

  • contribute comments, research, news stories, or other resources;
  • be notified when we update this portion of our website.

© 2008-2014 Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02454. All rights reserved.

Last page update: May 13, 2012