Strategic Plan Draft, March 5, 2013
A draft of the Brandeis University Strategic Plan for community review
Most documents below are in pdf format. If you cannot read them, you may have an incompatibility between your Acrobat plug-in and your browser, or you may need to update your Acrobat Reader to the latest version. Please go to http://www.adobe.com/products/reader.html to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader.
Alternatively, you can save the document to your computer and open it instead of viewing it in the browser.
A draft of the Brandeis University Strategic Plan for community review
This document outlines the next phase of the strategic planning process.
Links to the task force reports commissioned by the SPSC and developed by 110 members of the Brandeis community.
This framework seeks to ensure that Brandeis University remains a clear first choice for
exceptional students, faculty, and staff committed to making a difference in the world.
This is a compilation of the charges and membership for each of the eleven task forces that are working through the summer to provide input to the SPSC.
This memo from Provost Steve Goldstein to the task force leaders and members details the guidelines and deliverables that direct their work.
This chart illustrates the relationship of the constituents within the Brandeis community who are providing input to the Strategic Planning Steering Committee.
This chart indicates the basic elements of the strategic planning process.
The circular arrangement refers to the ongoing assessment and, if need be, revisions that will take place each year for the duration of the plan.
Introductory letter about the strategic planning process from Provost Steve Goldstein '78.
This paper highlights the principal themes and findings from eight discussions that included approximately 175 faculty members from across the institution.
This paper highlights the principal themes and findings from four meetings that included approximately 200 staff members from across the institution.
This paper highlights the principal themes and findings from a series of student-led discussions.
This paper highlights the principal themes and findings from two discussions with approximately 70 alumni, representing a range of classes from 1952 to 2011.