AI Syllabus Statements
Instructors should include a policy in each of their course syllabi delineating acceptable and unacceptable uses of generative AI. Thorough, well-crafted policies help ensure that students understand your expectations with regard to their interactions with generative AI tools, and create an environment in which students are comfortable raising questions about any new or uncertain use cases. In addition to publishing your policy in your syllabus, it's a good idea to review the policy carefully with your students and to have regular conversations in class about the use of generative AI, especially before major assignments.
In order to support Brandeis instructors, the university offers four policy "templates" ranging from more restrictive to more permissive (see below). Faculty may choose to:
- adopt one of the template statements as-is;
- modify one of the template statements to more closely align with the circumstances of their course; or
- develop their own policy statement.
Faculty who choose to develop their own statements are encouraged to:
- read the student-facing language on academic integrity in Section 4 of Rights and Responsibilities; and
- consult the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards or the Center for Teaching and Learning for feedback.
Note that there are many online compendia and advice guides offering examples of effective AI policies by discipline and/or context, such as this collection compiled by Lance Eaton, or this one from the University of Virginia's Teaching Hub.
Policy A (most restrictive)
Generative AI can be helpful to people completing the kinds of work that we are doing together in this course, and you may be expected to use it in your future endeavors. However, in order to be able to use generative AI effectively—not only in the sense of producing useful results, but also of being able to distinguish when it is or is not appropriate, ethical, and responsible to use it—you first need to become deeply familiar with our subject, and the kinds of analytical approaches that scholars typically apply to it, for yourself. It is only by developing your own capacities as a critical thinker and communicator that you will be fully empowered to make wise choices about when, how, and why to use—or not use—generative AI in the future. For this reason, you are not permitted to use generative AI while studying or completing work for this course.
I recognize that it is difficult (if not impossible) for you to avoid all encounters with generative AI, as many software applications, library databases, and other resources that I may encourage you to use while completing your work now incorporate AI features beyond our control. As such, I will not hold you accountable for engaging incidentally with third-party AI tools (e.g. using an “AI-enhanced” search function within a database licensed by the library, or simply reading an automatically-generated AI summary of a search result). Rather, this policy applies to cases in which you might be tempted to seek assistance from a generative AI platform (including, but not limited to, frontier LLMs like GPT-5, Gemini, or Claude) to summarize, create, complete, or revise work for this course, which—as above—I expect you to perform without assistance.
Policy B1 (situational; permitted for background learning)
Generative AI has a place in the work that we are doing together in this course, and likely in your future endeavors. One of my goals for this course is that you further develop your AI literacy—that is, not only a sense of how to use generative AI tools to produce useful results, but also a sense of when and why to use them (or not use them) so as to preserve your own voice and agency as a human responsible for the knowledge you consume and produce.
In order to make sure that you are using generative AI in a way that contributes to your learning, and does not shortcut it, I am placing limitations on the ways in which you may use it. In this course, you:
- may use generative AI to develop your understanding of a concept, to practice a skill, to review course material (e.g. by self-quizzing), and for other, similar purposes in which you are employing generative AI to facilitate your learning separately from the formal work that you submit for evaluation, which must be entirely your own intellectual product.
- may not use generative AI when completing any assignments that will be submitted and graded. This means that you may not use generative AI to refine written work and/or code (e.g. with Grammarly or Claude Code), even when you have drafted it substantially on your own; to help you perform analytical tasks that are part of assignments (e.g. identifying or analyzing patterns within large datasets, interpreting figures, etc.); to transform material you have created in one genre into another (e.g. to transform an essay into a website); and for other, similar purposes in which you are employing generative AI to enhance or refine your assignment submissions.
Policy B2 (situational; permitted for refining assignments)
Generative AI has a place in the work that we are doing together in this course, and likely in your future endeavors. One of my goals for this course is that you further develop your AI literacy—that is, not only a sense of how to use generative AI tools to produce useful results, but also a sense of when and why to use them (or not use them) so as to preserve your own voice and agency as a human responsible for the knowledge you consume and produce.
In order to make sure that you are using generative AI in a way that contributes to your learning, and does not shortcut it, I am placing limitations on the ways in which you may use it. In this course, you:
- may use generative AI to refine and polish the assignments that you submit for a grade, so long as the ideas, arguments, and analyses included in them is substantially your own. This means that you may use generative AI to refine written work and/or code (e.g. with Grammarly or Claude Code) that you have drafted substantially on your own; to help you perform analytical tasks that are part of assignments (e.g. identifying or analyzing patterns within large datasets, interpreting figures, etc.); to transform material you have created in one genre into another (e.g. to transform an essay into a website); and for other, similar purposes in which you are employing generative AI to enhance or refine your assignment submissions. In these cases, you must always cite your use of generative AI. Please consult the Library's Guide to Citing Generative AI for additional information on proper citations for artificial intelligence.
- may not use generative AI to develop your understanding of a concept, to practice a skill, to review course material (e.g. by self-quizzing), and for other, similar purposes in which you are employing generative AI in a way that substitutes for your own substantive thinking and learning. The best way to obtain mastery over the material in our course is to think, brainstorm, test yourself, and rethink on your own.
Policy C (most permissive)
Generative AI has a place in the work that we are doing together in this course, and likely in your future endeavors. One of my goals for this course is that you further develop your AI literacy—that is, not only a sense of how to use generative AI tools to produce useful results, but also a sense of when and why to use them (or not use them) so as to preserve your own voice and agency as a human responsible for the knowledge you consume and produce.
In this course, you:
- may use generative AI to develop your understanding of a concept, to practice a skill, to review course material (e.g. by self-quizzing), to refine written work and/or code that you have drafted substantially on your own (e.g. with Grammarly or Claude Code), to identify or analyze patterns within large datasets, to interpret figures, to transform material in one genre into another (e.g. to transform an essay into a website), and for other, similar purposes in which you are employing generative AI either to facilitate learning or to enhance or refine work that is substantially your own intellectual product.
- may not submit AI-generated work as if it were your own, without proper citation, or use AI to alter or fabricate data in ways that may be construed as research misconduct. Please see the Library’s Guide to Citing Generative AI for additional information on proper citations for artificial intelligence.
- Home
- About
- Events
- Faculty Programs
- For TAs, TFs, CAs, and IAs
- Consultations
- Services
-
Online Guides
- Active Learning
- Assessments
- Attendance & Engagement
- Generative AI
- Classroom Culture
- Classroom Practice
- How People Learn
- Instructional Technology
- Learning Objectives
- Mentoring
- Reading
- Study Skills
-
Syllabus Design
- A Brandeis Syllabus Template
- Academic Policies
- Syllabus Creation Guidelines
- AI Syllabus Statements
- Tips for TAs
- Teaching Portfolios
- Writing
- Key Campus Resources
Contact Us
Contact us with suggestions and questions about how the CTL can support your teaching at Brandeis!
- Email us at ctl@brandeis.edu
- Fill out our Contact Form
- Sign up for our CTL Newsletter