Department of Student Rights and Community Standards

Home / Rights and Responsibilities / Section 18. Procedural Standards in the Student Conduct Process (SCP)

Section 18. Procedural Standards in the Student Conduct Process (SCP)

A. Introduction to the Student Conduct Process (SCP)

The Student Conduct Process is the formal conduct process that utilizes a preponderance-of-the-evidence (more likely than not) standard to adjudicate most allegations related to “Rights and Responsibilities” that describe student behavioral expectations.

Related Processes

Certain allegations—such as those involving discrimination, harassment, or sexual violence—may be addressed through alternative processes:

Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) Formal Complaint Process: Applies to cases involving protected-class discrimination and harassment. See Section 3 and the OEO website for more information.
Title IX Grievance Process: Applies specifically to conduct covered by Title IX regulations.
The Dean of Students Office (DOSO) may adjudicate off-campus behavior as permitted under Section 21.

These processes are incorporated by reference and follow their own guidelines.

B. Disability Accommodations

If you have a disability and feel you will need an accommodation during this process, please immediately contact the office of Student Accessibility Support at 781-736-3470 or access@brandeis.edu. All requests for accommodations must be made in writing via email. Please notify your hearing officer in writing of any approved accommodations regarding this process a minimum of two (2) business days in advance of any meetings.

C. Student Rights in the Student Conduct Process

Brandeis University students have the right:

To have access to the most recent regulations (“Rights and Responsibilities”) published by the University and to receive a copy of those regulations upon request. The University will make reasonable efforts to make its policies known to students, faculty, and staff.
To be presumed not responsible unless decided otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence.
To admit responsibility for any or all of the alleged policy violations.
Participate in a Resolution Process that is fair, impartial, and provides adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard as outlined in University policies and procedures.
To request a reasonable delay of a conduct conference and/or hearing due to academic or extenuating circumstances.
To be advised in writing of all alleged policy violations, as initiated in a notification of University proceedings letter that may be emailed via campus email.
To submit your written account relating to the alleged policy violations.
To request an administrative agreement option to resolve the matter, when appropriate in the Student Conduct Process.
To speak on one’s own behalf, including the presentation of written and oral statements and physical exhibits, and to have material witnesses speak as part of any Student Conduct Hearing.
To decline to provide information at any stage of a Student Conduct Process.
To be accompanied by an Advisor at all phases of a Student Conduct Process. See the Formal Complaint Process and Title IX Grievance Process for details regarding OEO resolution processes.
To receive a timely notification in writing of the outcome of a Student Conduct Process via campus email.
To file an appeal of the outcome, as outlined in the appeals process.
To be assured of confidentiality, whenever possible, in accordance with the terms of the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
After a final decision has been made, and all appeals have been exhausted, to be free from subsequent hearings and/or sanctions for the same specific incident of alleged misconduct (except in cases where alleged policy violations of intentional omission or ambiguity of information or dishonesty, related to the initial hearing, are being reviewed).
Have disclosures of discrimination, harassment and sexual violence, including sexual assault, sexual exploitation, stalking, and relationship violence treated seriously by the University
Seek support services such as housing changes, academic support, or counseling services as applicable.
Notify law enforcement of the incident and seek their involvement if applicable. You also have the option to decline to personally report information to law enforcement, if applicable.

D. Notification and Scheduling of Conduct Conferences

Procedures for Resolving Student Conduct Allegations: Notification

A student will be notified of allegations via campus email. Such notification will list the alleged policy violations in an official notification of University proceeding letter. The letter will also include instructions on how to schedule a meeting with the Hearing Officer. A responding party will also receive a copy of their rights as well as a copy of the flow chart describing the process, which is found in Appendix G of this document.

E. Advisor Participation in the Conduct Process

The University recognizes that going through the Student Conduct Process can be stressful for all involved. To help support the involved parties, both the initiating party and the responding party are permitted to have one advisor of their choice present for hearings and for related meetings prior to, and after the hearing. An advisor may be any person of the party’s choosing, except as provided below. The advisor may provide only a strictly passive support. An advisor is not allowed to communicate with or on behalf of the initiating party/ responding party, nor communicate with witnesses or persons conducting meetings or hearings during those meetings or hearings. If at any point an advisor becomes disruptive or is otherwise unable to comport themselves within the parameters of the advisor role, they will be asked to leave the meeting. Witnesses are not allowed an advisor nor can they act as an advisor within the SCP. In exceptional circumstances, the Hearing Administrator, in consultation with the Student Conduct Board chairperson, may allow active participation by an Advisor during a hearing. This decision is within the sole discretion of the Hearing Administrator and said decision shall not serve as grounds for appeal. The lack of availability of any particular Advisor will not be considered a legitimate reason to reschedule or delay a hearing. To avoid even the appearance of undue influence, the administrator who advises the boards, members of the SCB, and members of the University Appeals Board are not eligible to serve as Advisors for the responding party or initiating party. A Witness may not also serve as an Advisor.

Neither party shall be permitted to employ professional legal counsel to participate in an Administrative Hearing, Student Conduct Board hearing, or in any related meeting or to advise the student during a hearing or related meeting. However, an attorney may serve as a passive advisor when coexisting criminal charges are pending resulting from the same incident being adjudicated through the Student Conduct Process (See DSRCS staff for details.)

F. Standards of Truthfulness, Evidence, and Evaluation

Truth and Admissibility: All persons giving information or statements are obligated to be truthful. Depending on the forum, the Hearing Officer in an Administrative Hearing or the Student Conduct Board (SCB) in a SCB hearing shall rule on the admissibility of information and of any witness statements. Unduly repetitious or irrelevant information or witness statements may be excluded. Rules of procedure and evidence applicable in civil or criminal cases in court do not apply.

Standard of Evaluation: Preponderance of the evidence standard - whether the facts presented support a finding that it is more likely than not that Brandeis University policy was violated is used in determining whether the responding party is responsible for the alleged violation(s).

G. Witness Participation and Submission of Written Statements

Witnesses and the Written Statements of Absent Witnesses: The responding party and initiating party may introduce witnesses during a hearing for the oral presentation of information. The responding party and the initiating party also may introduce the written statements of unavailable witnesses. In either manner, witnesses are those who:

a) were present during the incident in question, and/or
b) have information directly related to the incident in question, or that is relevant to the resolution of this process. Character witnesses are not considered relevant to this process.

For written statements of absentee witnesses to be introduced in a hearing, such statements must first be authenticated by the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards or its designee. To allow adequate time for authentication, written statements of absentee witnesses must be submitted to the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards not less than three (3) business days prior to the hearing. The requirement for authentication shall apply to all written statements that the parties wish to offer in a hearing including, but not limited to, communications sent from a Brandeis University email address, documents bearing a Brandeis University letterhead, and any written statements emanating from a source external to Brandeis University and/or the Brandeis community.

It is the responsibility of the parties to notify witnesses whom they plan to have appear at a hearing of the time, date, and location of the hearing. Parties must submit the names of their witnesses to the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards not later than forty eight (48) hours prior to the hearing. Additional (unlisted) witnesses may be considered at the sole discretion of the hearing officer in an administrative hearing or the Chairperson of the hearing panel in a Student Conduct Board hearing. A party’s failure to secure the presence of a witness at a hearing shall not serve as grounds for continuing or otherwise delaying the hearing.

H. Student Organization and Group Conduct Process

In accordance with Rights & Responsibilities and related University policies, individual students as well as University sponsored groups/organizations (including but not limited to recognized undergraduate and graduate student organizations, clubs, teams, societies, etc.), and their officers/leadership, may be held collectively responsible when violations of University policies occur. Officers, leaders and members of University sponsored groups/organizations are expected to know and abide by all University policies specific to that sponsored group/organization and students in general. The conduct process for University sponsored groups/organizations mirrors the process for individual students, with some nuances. Notification of process will be sent to the group’s President and/or leadership. Representatives of the group (no more than two) will progress through the Student Conduct Process as detailed below. If group leadership is not able to be identified, all identifiable members of the group will receive the notification and be responsible for working with that sponsored group to identify the student representative(s) who will participate in the Student Conduct Process and communicate that information to Student Rights and Community Standards. For the purposes of Section 18, all references to “student” may be utilized in reference to the group representative(s). Note: This would not preclude the University from moving forward with a formal process for individuals involved in the group process.

Intimidating, threatening, coercing, harassing, or retaliating against any party, witness, advisor, or anyone who files a CSR or otherwise participates in the SCP or any related inquiry is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes such behavior by/through a third-party (e.g. friend, family member, attorney, etc.) See also Section 2.12 Retaliation.

I. Conduct Conference and Resolution Options

During this meeting, a student will be provided the opportunity to discuss the allegations, review their options for resolution, and select one of those options using the Choice of Action Form. Alternative options for resolution may be offered and explored at the discretion of the Hearing Officer. Students can waive the right to this meeting and move forward to one of the options for resolution via email.

Students have the option to elect to resolve the case with an administrative agreement or an administrative hearing. The student will additionally have the option to resolve the case through a Student Conduct Board if their case has potential to result in suspension or dismissal if found responsible for some or all of the alleged policy violations, for academic integrity related cases, or as deemed appropriate by the SSAO or designee.

During this meeting, or within a reasonable timeframe thereafter, the Hearing Officer may drop any alleged policy violation deemed to be without basis.

Any student who does not respond to a request to meet will have their case forwarded to an administrative hearing. Any student who does not complete the Choice of Action Form within the specified timeline may have their case forwarded to an administrative hearing.

Options for Resolution: Administrative Agreement

During a Conduct Conference, a responding party and the hearing officer may engage in a conversation to discuss responsibility and appropriate sanctions for the alleged violation(s). During the Conduct Conference, or within a reasonable time thereafter, upon receipt of a Choice of Action Notification, the responding party may enter into an Administrative Agreement by acknowledging responsibility for the alleged violations, and accepting the sanctions set forth in the Choice of Action Notification. The responding party can choose to engage in this option via email rather than at an in-person meeting. In cases of multiple allegations, the responding party must, to enter into an Administrative Agreement, acknowledge in their Choice of Action Form, responsibility for all alleged violations and acceptance of all sanctions as presented in the Choice of Action Notification.

J. Hearing Types and Procedures

1. Administrative Hearing

This option provides the opportunity to have an individual hearing officer determine responsibility and sanctions for all allegations.

If, after having chosen an Administrative Hearing as the means by which to resolve a case, the Responding Party fails to attend said hearing after having been sent notice of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall complete the hearing, the Responding Party’s absence notwithstanding. If, after their absence, the Responding Party seeks to: participate in the hearing; or, reopen a resolved case, the Responding Party must present compelling evidence of a circumstance that was beyond their control that prevented their participation. The decision to grant the Responding Student’s request rests within the sole discretion of the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards and that decision shall not be subject to appeal.

Procedures for Administrative Hearings

Under the Administrative Hearing option, the hearing officer will, as soon as reasonably possible, meet with the responding party on an individual basis. The hearing officer may also meet with the reporting party and/or any relevant witnesses, if known, or made known, to the hearing officer by either party, on the same individual basis. The hearing officer shall notify the responding party in writing of the decision, confirming the action taken and a summary of the reason(s) for the decision.

2. Student Conduct Board (SCB) Hearing

This option is only available to a student if their case has potential to result in suspension or dismissal if found responsible for some or all of the alleged policy violations, for academic integrity related cases, or as deemed appropriate by the SSAO or designee. SCBs provides the opportunity for a student to have their case heard before a panel of students, faculty, and staff. The hearing will determine both responsibility and sanctions, if deemed necessary.

K. Student Conduct Board Hearing Logistics and Participant Expectations

A hearing shall be held as soon as practicable from the date the responding party chooses an SCB hearing (when an SCB is an applicable option). All hearings will be closed, meaning that only official participants may be present in the hearing room. Notice of the hearing date shall be delivered to the responding party in person, or to the responding party’s Brandeis email account or the responding party’s home address, at least 48 hours in advance of the hearing.

Procedures for SCP Hearings before the Student Conduct Board (SCB) Include:

The Hearing Administrator:

An administrator from the DSRCS or another Student Affairs professional shall serve as the Hearing Administrator. Student Affairs reserves the right to appoint external personnel with expertise in conduct and/or adjudication to serve in roles including Hearing Administrator and other Student Conduct Board roles.” The non-voting role of the Hearing Administrator is to ensure appropriate execution of the hearing as prescribed in Section 18. Responsibilities of the Hearing Administrator also include: (a) advising the Board regarding the requirements and provisions of the Student Conduct Process (SCP); (b) providing information relevant to procedures or sanctions; (c) providing continuity in Board operations and procedures; (d) facilitating the implementation of conduct procedures at all levels of the SCP; (e) acting as a liaison between Boards and the University community; and (f) assisting the Board in fulﬁlling its educational responsibilities. The Hearing Administrator shall be available prior to the hearing at the request of the initiating party and responding party to provide information regarding the alleged violation and relevant procedural matters. To provide adequate notice to all parties, names of any Advisors and/or witnesses will be submitted by the initiating party and the responding party to the DSRCS at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. The Hearing Administrator may share the names of witnesses and Advisors with the responding party and initiating party prior to the hearing.

Outside Contact:

The responding party and initiating party and their Advisors are prohibited from intimidating, harassing, or retaliating against any parties related to the case, including but not limited to witnesses and advisors.

Conflicts of Interest:

Student Conduct Board members may be informed of the initiating party’s and responding party’s names and of all alleged policy violation(s) prior to a hearing so as to avoid conﬂicts of interest. Any SCB members may accordingly recuse themselves, and either party to the case may request the Board to disqualify a member if the party can satisfy the remaining members of the particular SCB panel that there is sufficient cause for disqualification based on a claim of a conflict of interest. An alternate member may take the place of the disqualified member, or the responding party and initiating party may agree to proceed without the prescribed minimum voting composition of the Board.

Attendance:

The responding party and the initiating party must be present at the hearing. In the event that a hearing is being conducted via live video or audio, the participants must be available via the agreed-on means at the time designated.

Witnesses:

The responding party and initiating party may present information and introduce witnesses during the hearing. Witnesses are those who were present during the incident in question and/or have information directly related to the incident in question or that is relevant to the resolution of this process. Please note that character witnesses are not considered relevant to this process and are therefore not permitted. It is the responsibility of the initiating party and the responding party to notify their witnesses and Advisor regarding the time, date, and location of the hearing. Additional (unlisted) witnesses may be considered at the discretion of the chairperson of the Board during the Full Hearing. Witnesses must be available when called by the chairperson, or their statement may be disallowed. Any expenses incurred by a witness in order to participate will be the responsibility of the witness. Note: Any records or other evidence retained by the University may be subject to production by court order.

Information:

The responding party and the initiating party shall have the right to view and question all information and reports presented to the Board during the hearing. The Hearing Administrator retains the discretion not to share certain records due to confidentiality concerns, in accordance with applicable law. The responding party and the initiating party shall have the right to question all witnesses appearing before the Board, but only at the hearing. Note: Any records or other information retained by the University may be subject to production by court order.

Findings:

The SCB shall make one of the following decisions upon completion of a Full Hearing: (a) a finding of “not responsible”; (b) a finding of “responsible” (based on preponderance of the evidence) and, in the case of a finding of responsibility in a Full Hearing or at the conclusion of a Sanction Hearing, the recommendation of a sanction; or (c) continuance of the case to obtain additional information or for further consideration. Decisions shall be based solely upon information and statements introduced at the hearing. All decisions shall be made by majority vote. The chairperson shall vote only to break a tie.

Hearing Report:

A written Hearing Report, comprised of a summary of evidence presented at the hearing and the decision rendered by the SCB, shall be made by the Hearing Administrator. Hearing Reports will be retained by the DSRCS for seven years from the date of the final outcome (including appeals, if any) after which it will be destroyed, except in situations where the outcome results in the student’s dismissal or suspension or when the student is involved in further conduct action. When the outcome results in the student’s dismissal or suspension, the record will be maintained permanently. When there are multiple incidents and associated conduct records, all records will be maintained for seven years from the date of the final outcome for the most recent incident, after which the records will be destroyed (except in extraordinary cases as deﬁned by the DOS Office). Access to such records is governed by the University Records Policy (see Section 16.4.). Brandeis is required by law to provide statistics and narrative information about certain confidential information. Personally identifiable information will be removed from such communications whenever possible. Note: Any records or other evidence retained by the University may be subject to production by court order.

Failure to Attend:

If, after having chosen a Student Conduct Board hearing as the means by which to resolve a case, the Responding Party fails to attend the hearing after having been sent notice of the hearing, the hearing shall proceed in the Responding Party’s absence.

If, after their absence, the Responding Party seeks a new hearing or seeks to reopen a resolved case, the Responding Party must present compelling evidence of a circumstance beyond their control that prevented their participation. The decision to grant the Responding Party’s request rests within the sole discretion of the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards and that decision shall not be subject to appeal.

If a student who is the Responding Party in a conduct action is on a Health Leave of Absence (HLOA) the following shall apply: the Department of Student Rights and Community Standards (DSRCS) shall defer (place on hold) that conduct action until the student has been approved to return as an active student from their Health Leave of Absence. The DSRCS (or designee) shall review the subject student’s status on a regular basis to determine whether the conduct action should resume active status.

If the Responding Party has been notified of the conduct action prior to withdrawing, graduating, changing their student status, or being placed on LOA status for other than health related reasons, that conduct action may not be subject to deferral.

Note: When students withdraw or transfer from the University during an active conduct proceeding, the Dean’s Certification will note that the student withdrew during a pending conduct process unless otherwise resolved. The decision to withdraw from the University is one that any student should make in consultation with advisors, family, guardians, Academic Services, or other trusted administrators or faculty.

L. Conduct Record Retention and Disclosure

A record of the conduct process (Administrative Agreement, Student Conduct Board Hearing, or Administrative Hearing), comprised of a summary of the evidence presented and the decision rendered, shall be made by the administrator. Such records are conﬁdential and shall be retained by the DSRCS for seven years from the date of the final outcome (including appeals, if any), after which it will be destroyed, except in situations where the outcome results in the student’s dismissal or suspension or when the student is involved in further conduct action. When the outcome results in the student’s dismissal or expulsion, the record will be maintained permanently. When there are multiple incidents and associated conduct records, all records will be maintained for seven years from the date of the final outcome, after which the records will be destroyed (except in extraordinary cases as deﬁned by the DOS). Conduct process outcomes will vary based on findings of responsibility and severity of violation. Access to such records is governed by the University Records Policy (see Section 16.4.). Brandeis is required by law to provide statistics and narrative information about certain confidential information. Personally identifiable information will be removed from such communications whenever possible. Note: Any records or other evidence retained by the University may be subject to production by court order.

The University may exercise its right to appropriately disclose disciplinary records without a Student’s consent pursuant to exceptions provided by FERPA or as otherwise permitted or required by law.

M. Appeals Process and Grounds for Appeal

Appeals Procedures for Conduct Processes

Following approval or modification of the sanction(s) by the DOS Office or the DSRCS, the responding party shall have the right to submit an appeals request to the DSRCS or designee concerning the decision of a board or Hearing Officer. Such appeals requests shall be based only on specific evidence, presented in writing, of:

- - - - Procedural Error: The responding party alleges that
        
        the procedural requirements of SCP were not followed and
        
        that deviation from the process had an adverse impact on the outcome of the complaint against the responding party.
        
        New Information: The responding party alleges that, subsequent to the issuing of the final outcome, new information became available which could have impacted the outcome of the complaint. The responding party must:
        
        present the new information;
        
        show why it was unavailable prior to the final outcome; and
        
        show that the new information could have altered the outcome of the complaint.

Appeals are not a new fact-finding process. Appeals shall not be based upon, or granted due to, dissatisfaction with an imposed sanction. Appeals requests must be filed within five business days of delivery of the conduct action to the student in person, or to the student’s home address or Brandeis email address. Factual disputes are not a basis for appeal. Instead, the appeal must be set forth under which of the two grounds the appeal is filed. Appeals that do not comply with these requirements, including failing to state a proper grounds for appeal or for not meeting required submission timelines, may not be considered, as determined by the Dean of Students (or their designee). The determination if your appeal submission meets the stated grounds for appeal will be based entirely on the written material(s) you submit and may not involve a meeting relative to that submission.

When the Dean of Students (or designee) identifies that the submitted appeals request meets the stated grounds for appeal, the University Appeals Board shall be convened to review the submission. Upon review, the Appeals Board may uphold the original decision and sanction(s) imposed, re-engage the original hearing body for additional process, and/or identify any additional process requirements. If new information is presented, the UAB has the option to ask DSRCS to re-engage the Student Conduct Process.

Notes:

Information that was known or reasonably available to the responding party at the time of the hearing, but which they failed to present, shall not be considered new information.

Appeals procedures will be addressed in the final outcome letter to the responding party.

N. Continuance Requests

A responding party who obtains information at their hearing that might lead to new evidence, may request a continuance of the case at that time, which may be granted at the discretion of the SCB or Hearing Officer. Only new information received subsequent to the issuance of the final outcome can be grounds for appeal.