Call for Faculty Participants
A required part of the Brandeis Core, the First Year Experience includes a series of “Critical Conversations” based around a theme to introduce students to our academic community, to model the different types of intellectual inquiries available on the University Campus, to create a shared experience, and to invite students to think and talk about issues that are central to their educational development and the world around them.
In particular, Critical Conversations feature interdisciplinary conversations that highlight both the range and substance of intellectual activity on our campus, and the ways in which different disciplines present evidence and rhetorical arguments. Because diversity, equity, and inclusion are at the core of Brandeis’ history and mission, we value and are seeking participants with a variety of social identities as well as proposals that engage with ongoing conversations about diversity and social justice.
The theme of the first year of Critical Conversations was “Truth.” In the second year, we are calling for groups of three faculty volunteers (two presenters and one moderator) to participate in public conversations on the theme of “Identity” to be scheduled in the early evening around the middle weeks of each semester, followed by opportunities to further engage with students in smaller settings (i.e., Small Group Discussions).
In addition to proposals to stage these public conversations for audiences of approximately 150-250 first year students and other members of the campus community, we are also interested in more experimental frameworks that encourage active student participation. Preference will be given to first time presenters.
We have selected the theme of “Identity” for the second year because of its centrality to our current debates and movements on our campus, in national and international politics, and across many different academic disciplines. What constitutes and contributes to individual and group identities is as hotly contested as what an identity means to a person’s life or the organization of an institution or a nation state.
We are interested in proposals from a range of academic disciplines that reflect on historical and current definitions of and inquiries into concepts of identity.
- What does storytelling or literature say about how we know who we are?
- How does a philosophical perspective on ‘sameness’ and variation inform ethical perspectives on identity?
- What do we believe about the impact of genetics and experience on identity?
- How does the identity of a researcher impact procedure and conclusions in experimental science?
- Do understandings of identity shape economic and political decision making?
- How do aspects of race, gender, sexual orientation, income level, religion and ability, together or individually, shape our identity and experience of the world?
- What do we need to know about identity to help create a more just world?
- What kinds of avenues to understanding identity do the creative arts offer that conventional academic debate do not?
We welcome proposals that pair discussants from different disciplines with a moderator from a third discipline, but we are also willing to hear from volunteers who want to be placed in a discussion if an appropriate topic and partners are available.
As discussed in the original Critical Conversations proposal, the moderator should plan to “interrupt” the conversation to help audience members notice rhetorical arguments or use of evidence, and to think about the argument/counter argument just presented.
Conversants might be asked if they would construct a written argument differently from an oral argument, or other such questions.
Proposals should be submitted online and should specify:
- The envisioned title of the Critical Conversation.
- The faculty participants.
- A two or three line description/explanation/blurb that would be shared with first year students and UWS instructors and posted online.
- Any material or audiovisual needs.
- How the event supports the year’s theme of “Identity.”
- What you would hope for students to integrate from your presentation and argumentation into their writing.
For discussants, please include two to three sentences explaining what kind of a perspective you bring to your discussion of “Identity”, what disciplinary framework your contribution will introduce, and what you think students may gain from the discussion.
Conversants will receive honoraria of $750 and moderators will receive $250.
Please submit your proposal by Dec. 2, 2019. Notifications for accepted proposals will be sent by the beginning of the Spring Semester.